Drücke „Enter”, um zum Inhalt zu springen.
Hinweis zu diesem Datenschutz-Blog:
Anscheinend verwenden Sie einen Werbeblocker wie uBlock Origin oder Ghostery, oder einen Browser, der bestimmte Dienste blockiert.
Leider wird dadurch auch der Dienst von VG Wort blockiert. Online-Autoren haben einen gesetzlichen Anspruch auf eine Vergütung, wenn ihre Beiträge oft genug aufgerufen wurden. Um dies zu messen, muss vom Autor ein Dienst der VG Wort eingebunden werden. Ohne diesen Dienst geht der gesetzliche Anspruch für den Autor verloren.

Ich wäre Ihnen sehr verbunden, wenn Sie sich bei der VG Wort darüber beschweren, dass deren Dienst anscheinend so ausgeprägt ist, dass er von manchen als blockierungswürdig eingestuft wird. Dies führt ggf. dazu, dass ich Beiträge kostenpflichtig gestalten muss.

Durch Klick auf folgenden Button wird eine Mailvorlage geladen, die Sie inhaltlich gerne anpassen und an die VG Wort abschicken können.

Nachricht an VG WortMailtext anzeigen

Betreff: Datenschutzprobleme mit dem VG Wort Dienst(METIS)
Guten Tag,

als Besucher des Datenschutz-Blogs Dr. DSGVO ist mir aufgefallen, dass der VG Wort Dienst durch datenschutzfreundliche Browser (Brave, Mullvad...) sowie Werbeblocker (uBlock, Ghostery...) blockiert wird.
Damit gehen dem Autor der Online-Texte Einnahmen verloren, die ihm aber gesetzlich zustehen.

Bitte beheben Sie dieses Problem!

Diese Nachricht wurde von mir persönlich abgeschickt und lediglich aus einer Vorlage generiert.
Wenn der Klick auf den Button keine Mail öffnet, schreiben Sie bitte eine Mail an info@vgwort.de und weisen darauf hin, dass der VG Wort Dienst von datenschutzfreundlichen Browser blockiert wird und dass Online Autoren daher die gesetzlich garantierten Einnahmen verloren gehen.
Vielen Dank,

Ihr Klaus Meffert - Dr. DSGVO Datenschutz-Blog.

PS: Wenn Sie meine Beiträge oder meinen Online Website-Check gut finden, freue ich mich auch über Ihre Spende.
Ausprobieren Online Webseiten-Check sofort das Ergebnis sehen

Artificial Intelligence in Administration: often problematic and not useful

0
Dr. DSGVO Newsletter detected: Extended functionality available
More articles · Website-Checks · Live Offline-AI
📄 Article as PDF (only for newsletter subscribers)
🔒 Premium-Funktion
Der aktuelle Beitrag kann in PDF-Form angesehen und heruntergeladen werden

📊 Download freischalten
Der Download ist nur für Abonnenten des Dr. DSGVO-Newsletters möglich

Many routine tasks in administration can be simplified by websites, FAQs or intelligent assistants for citizens and businesses. For this, no new algorithms are needed. Rather, it would have been possible for many years now. Why a visit to the authorities is better than being replaced with AI is explained here.

Introduction

The motivation for this post what an article in F.A.Z. titled "The chatbot should replace the office visit". In it, digital politician Ronja Kemmer, who leads the Commission on Human Digitalization, explains how administrative processes are to be simplified by AI.

As application cases for AI are mentioned in the FAZ:

  • Orientation "for simple questions
  • Informationsangebote,
  • Application submission and processing
  • Appeal procedure
  • Work steps" take over in "standardized complaints" such as flight delays.

That sounds in many parts directly as if it had been possible since twenty years already. After all, a human should make the final decision on "elementary questions".

General statements are of little help when it comes down to specifics and must be done. Too often general wishes or announcements have led to the mistaken assumption that some expert will already know what and how something can be realized in which way. It is overlooked that many wishes cannot be implemented because Aladdin's magic lamp is currently borrowed by someone else. Sometimes even Aladdin knows that his magic lamp is not suitable for certain wishes. For example, if someone wants a bag of potatoes, Aladdin sends this person to the vegetable vendor around the corner.

Obviously it is not widespread that an artificial intelligence is not there to provide exact answers to questions from citizens. It works even less for legal issues, because opinions rather than facts prevail there.

You can ask Albert Einstein how a house foundation with a defective joint is renovated, or you can ask your colleague who is a tile layer sitting next door in his office.

A moderate analogy to "Ask a generally educated but otherwise dumb AI (and cobble together the wrong answer that must be corrected afterwards) or ask a competent specialist who answers correctly right away and can also mention current working methods

In addition to the points mentioned above, it will be noted below in detail why this has been possible for many years now. Rather than just sleeping through the megatrend called "Internet" ("new territory"), politics is now trying to jump on the next train because many uninformed people consider AI to be the universal savior.

Solutions without AI

The tasks mentioned above in administration, which are best accomplished with artificial intelligence according to the expert commission for humane digitalization, will be examined more closely individually.

Orientation with simple questions

Simple questions can often be answered simply. Regardless, there are not infinitely many simple questions, but only a countably finite number of them. How about a question-and-answer catalog? To do this, at least one person would have to take the trouble to write down frequently asked questions from citizens (or companies) to the administration over two days. The answers to these questions can be given by competent colleagues in the administration better than any AI and written down once.

Thinking about standard processes leads primarily when experienced employees are forced to achieve faster and higher quality results than when a general intelligence (AI) is used for this purpose.

Please prove me the opposite.

If a comfortable search function is desired, it can be realized either with a conventional search engine or with a vector search engine mentioned below.

Sounds like a search engine, is it too. As is well known, there are already search engines. As I myself have found out when building an extended search function for this blog, Dr. GDPR, a pure AI search often brings up poor results.

Read full article now via free Dr. GDPR newsletter.
More extras for subscribers:
Offline-AI · Free contingent+ for Website-Checks
Already a subscriber? Click on the link in the newsletter & refresh this page.
Subscribe to Newsletter
About the author on dr-dsgvo.de
My name is Klaus Meffert. I have a doctorate in computer science and have been working professionally and practically with information technology for over 30 years. I also work as an expert in IT & data protection. I achieve my results by looking at technology and law. This seems absolutely essential to me when it comes to digital data protection. My company, IT Logic GmbH, also offers consulting and development of optimized and secure AI solutions.

ChatGPT and Bing AI as a guarantee for incorrect results. Data friendliness and data accuracy?